![]() ![]() To correspond to reality, the statement should say this: “That some Israelites believed Israelite El had a consort is supported by textual and archaeological evidence.” Now it’s accurate. ![]() ![]() This is overstated, but reflects what the consensus would say. “That the Israelite El had a consort is supported by textual and archaeological evidence.” I see where he is coming from, but I also have some reflections to share that will hopefully illuminate my thinking on the issues: Michael first has some concerns with the preciseness of my language in a couple places. ![]() I’m glad to have an informed response, and Michael’s comments will provide great food for thought as I develop this research for presentation at a regional SBL, at CSBS, at SBL in November (although in the latter it’s mainly Psalm 82 I’m discussing), and in my Trinity Western masters thesis. Michael disagrees with some of the main conclusions I reached, but that was expected. That’s something I struggle with sometimes, and it’s great to see that the attention I pay to it is producing results. I was especially happy to have him comment that he felt the writing was clear and concise. For those interested, it can be found here. I appreciate Michael taking the time to respond to my paper and to provide a number of helpful insights. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |